|
|
|
|
|
|
by castillar76
3155 days ago
|
|
|
Interesting idea! I know the CT spec recommends that clients archive CT data received for later review, and it defines the concept of a CT 'auditor' that constantly reviews the logs from CT log servers looking for malfeasance. It would be interesting and very useful to amalgamate anonymized data from browsers into one of those auditors and crunch through it to compare to CT records. |
|
|