[sepeth]

How? Really? Ask that to a child beaten up by their parents in the street. I am sure that child won't make the same mistake again. I am not interested about if Linus is right or wrong, many other people have done that already. I am more interested the way that he speaks. I am gonna go ahead and say it. The way he speaks in this email is ugly, wrong, and should never be encouraged. The language we use is important, even though sometimes it takes more effort, love takes effort, good things take effort, and good communication takes effort too. We should at least try to be nice. Otherwise life would be kak.

[dawnbreez]

Equating this email to a parent beating their child is a false equivalency. Firstly, because Linus has not physically attacked the developer, and secondly, because the developer--unlike the child--should know better. This is more like Gordon Ramsay going off on a chef who has just told a customer off for not liking his burnt toast.

[sepeth]

I agree with the first part, but not with the second part. I believe equating John's behaviour to a chef who has told a customer off is just as distant as mine.

If I was looking exact equivalent, I would just send the same link to the same email.

I am using empathy here. I don't know you guys, you may feel ok if you get shouted when you do wrong when contributing to a project, but I would feel bad, and as a human, I don't think my feelings are not important. If it is coming from an important person like Linus Torvalds, this would hurt even more, and really I don't see anything disrespectful to anyone in John's email.

[dawnbreez]

I would argue that the best response to an expert telling you that you are wrong is to fix the problem. While your feelings do matter, the stability of the kernel matters more, and you cannot discount Linus's message because you think it is too emotional in tone. At the end of the day, Linus is right, Linus created the project, Linus is leading the project, and he is using strong language to inform you that he needs John to change his approach to this problem for the sake of the project.

On a slightly more pragmatic note, Linus would not be angry if John hadn't been trying to break Rule Number 1 for three weeks in a row, so an alternative solution is to simply not break the rules. Granted, if you disagree with the rules on a fundamental level, that doesn't work--so, third solution: leave and start your own project.

[raverbashing]

> The way he speaks in this email is ugly, wrong

If that's the way problems get solved, then he's right in using it

If you ask nicely and people don't do it, or keep ignoring it then you up the tone

[sepeth]

And to the people who actually help you.

Not only your users are important, people who help you are also important.

> If you ask nicely and people don't do it, or keep ignoring it then you up the tone

I am sure it can be done much better with a little effort. Being smart, or being someone who has done something important shouldn't exempt you from being nice to other people.

[dawnbreez]

>Being smart, or being someone who has done something important shouldn't exempt you from being nice to other people. Absolutely. However, not being nice to someone does not mean you are wrong. One can be an asshole and still be correct, and one can have one's feelings hurt by the truth (indeed, psychologists will tell you that if it upsets you it absolutely is something you need to dig deeper on).