|
|
|
|
|
|
by microcolonel
3156 days ago
|
|
|
> When I used Angular 1, the two way binding was a breath of fresh air. Yeah, to be honest, if you aren't suffering performance issues as a result of it, Angular 1 is very productive. Problems present themselves in applications with large views, or using esoteric low-performing features. Angular >2 should never have been called Angular. Even if they call it "Angular" instead of "AngularJS", everyone called AngularJS Angular to begin with. It's so utterly different that it doesn't even fit in the same places. |
|
|