Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by viraptor 3158 days ago
I don't think I've read the inquirer articles before, but is this a standard?

> EARLY ADOPTERS ... have been quick to moan that ...

> ... gamers have taken to the Steam forums to whine about ...

> DRM all too often seems to make users lives' a misery

They're just talking about a broken game, right? (That will likely get patched in a few days/weeks)

1 comments

It's more the batshit crazy idea behind it. If you want to play the game you have two choices:

1. Pay for the game to support the creation of more games. This path will include invasive DRM that either causes performance problems, damages your hardware, or disallows you from playing the game you paid for, for instance when you're not connected to the internet.

2. Pirate the game, play it how you want.

That they punish the users who do the right thing and reward those who do not is crazy to me. That it has continued for so long without a collective wakeup call that you should not punish the people who give you money and play by the rules is mindboggling.

There exists a third option. Pay for the game, then pirate the superior cracked version.
Which is still illegal regardless of whether it's moral.

I'm trying to find a way to work in a bound for the floor reference but none of them fit.