|
|
|
|
|
by rtkwe
3157 days ago
|
|
That becomes a huge amount data to track though if it's individual labeling. It'll start out ok but quickly get huge. Also doing that requires a decent percentage of people to be actively scanning things, otherwise counterfeiters could just play the odds. |
|
No, it's the same pattern as software CD-Keys and that's been working fine at scale for decades. You draw from a pool of unique, unpredictable codes based on a secret seed, and keep a tally of the number of claims over that code. The only difference here is that instead of the online service 'failing activation' for your software, it simply displays the number of activations to the end user. If 'this code has already been redeemed' comes up for your $2 ali express MOSFETs, you know you're dealing with a knock-off.
>doing that requires a decent percentage of people to be actively scanning things, otherwise counterfeiters could just play the odds
I'll partially concede this point - It's certainly a factor. However, if the down-stream effect is product returns, the middle man sellers are likely to take corrective action against the suppliers. I'm not convinced that this limitation of the proposed system will render it ineffective.