[nirvdrum]

It's a legitimate point to consider. I've set up my home router with Tomato by Shibby, which allows routing all traffic over a VPN link. I was finding the router couldn't keep up with a 50 Mbps link. Granted, these routers aren't designed with that use case in mind. But, running a VPN link all the time on mobile devices kills battery very quickly, so setting up the link on the router is preferable. Consequently, I don't route all traffic over the VPN, which is suboptimal.

[pnutjam]

I put a 2nd router behind my regular router and switch the gateway, on devices I want to use the VPN, to this 2nd router. Benefits: 1. allow devices to use non-vpn friendly sites 2. Keeps everyone on the same subnet so the VPN is not in the way for local file transfers. 3. main router not overburdened by VPN software

[nirvdrum]

Tomato allows selective routing, both by destination and by device, so that's helpful. Your setup definitely avoids some of the overhead mine has. But, really, I'd just like the little ARM processor in my R7000 to be able to keep up so I can saturate my link. I'm not familiar with ARM's ISA all that much, but it seems an AES-NI equivalent would be really nice to have.

[bearbearbear]

There's no catching him, he's behind 80 proxies.