|
|
|
|
|
by MichaelGG
3160 days ago
|
|
So when they purposefully dismiss F# and say it's just useful for scientific and engineering (with a touch of finance) they find they don't get much adoption from general business developers? F#, even if used as a better C#, is still a win. C# has improved a ton since F# appeared, but it's still clunky. Microsoft should have had a push, F# for everyone, but this is the company that had to be dragged into generics (by the F# people) so I don't know what we'd expect. All F# needs is real committment to level tooling. Instead it's an afterthought. It's enough to give even me pause when starting a project. |
|