|
|
|
|
|
by nerdponx
3161 days ago
|
|
The terse syntax is totally off-putting to most people and it makes it a hard sell at work or to a research group. I suspect the only reason it found a niche in quant finance is that those guys are geniuses and can kinda do whatever the hell they want. They also don't have to share their code all that often AFAIK. There's also no reason for it. Heck, you could even give each function an alias, write a "verbose language", and have it compile to the short form before being processed further. Then you could even write both long-form and short-form, and interleave the two if you really wanted. |
|
There's also kerf, which is verbose; AFAIK it was not met was the same success that APL, J or K have -- though likely for unrelated reasons.