[wickedlogic]

My comment still stands. Likely? they could have fixed their infringing acts.

Trademark infringement is not what took down this service (or so motivated these people to take down the service). I have yet to read an "IP" compliance request that was accurate, truthful, or aligned with achieving a correct legal understanding between parties. This is not an accident. The use of that term creates an artificial whole, which is then used to imply greater authority over the sum of the parts.

My comment is on the prior comment, which is about the concept... not this specific instance, even though it is still applicable.