No, because he:
a) has a very high approval rating,
b) minimized a lot of corruption problems for Russia where people were stealing absolutely everywhere after the soviet collapse
c) does not commit humanitarian crimes
I'm not involved in any way, but from the news I watch, both a) and c) claims are debatable. I guess he's not worse than what he replaced, but that doesn't make him good. At least that's the spin in the media in my country, possibly very biased for a lot of reasons.