|
|
|
|
|
by scottmp10
3162 days ago
|
|
It's true that the columnar inhibition is not the best supported part of the theory but seems a very strong deduction based on many papers that don't directly support but show the same behavior as this part of the theory. We know that minicolumns exist and cells in minicolumns share receptive fields. But they aren't always active together and HTM theory provides a hypothesis for why. This very recent preprint paper out of Michael Berry's lab at Princeton shows almost identical behavior that HTM sequence memory would predict and I'm not aware of other theories that would have predicted this behavior: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/10/03/197608 As far as sparsity supporting robust pattern recognition, this paper details the math that shows this: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.07469 |
|