|
|
|
|
|
by lordnacho
3160 days ago
|
|
> The "logic" of the system is NOT transparent nor generally known to native speakers. Totally true, you often find people wondering what exactly the pattern is. A good language teacher will tell you though. > A Scandinavist language reform movement tried to get the 20-based forms replaced by 10-based like Norwegian and Swedish have. With absolutely no success. If this is a real movement, they need better PR. I've never heard anyone make this case. What's the point anyway? Interestingly if you look at French, there's a similar thing with the numbers between French French and Swiss French. Soixante-dix vs septante, and similar for 80 and 90. |
|
I was very pleased at a concert when the barman said "niti fem" -- was this the reform I'd heard about, from reading this page? No, said my friend, it's just my spoken Danish is so bad the barman thought I was Swedish, and tried to be nice.
I've lived here for two years, and I still can't reliably distinguish between "fem og tres" and "fem halv tres".