|
|
|
|
|
by bobbinsbob
3166 days ago
|
|
I used to be a security guard after I left the army (no skills in civvi street to get a better job). Couple of things come to mind reading this. One that security guard is probably getting paid a pittance to do that job and you get what you pay for. Two the guard recognises you and your colleagues, knows you work there and doesn't really care that you're playing silly games because on their wage it's not worth the hassle pulling you up for you to get all high and mighty about the inconvenience of a lowly security guard daring to question you. Three that single guard, whilst ostensibly there for "security" is really just there for show, there's no way a single lowly paid guard can possibly provide security for a building housing 8 or 9 companies even with the best intentions. My experience as a guard was that the employees of the companies within the building treated me with contemptuous distain until something happened at which point it was righteous anger. |
|
:(
It's good to see (from the existence of these new articles) that companies are slowly starting to realize that security isn't something to sweep under the carpet and hold in distain.
What do you mean by "righteous anger" though? It sounds like there's a potentially interesting story (or three) hiding in there...