|
|
|
|
|
by esrauch
3160 days ago
|
|
I don't really understand what the downsides are, given the choices are "phone" or "phone + music player". Is "music player only" actually a feasible option for anyony (besides the case of runners, where you are temporarily without your phone)? Like how is "the music player battery lasts for 5 days, and phone battery lasts 1.5 days" a pro-music-player argument: it means the options are "charge every day" and "charge every day, and additionally a second thing every 5 days", right? |
|
My phones never last 1.5 days of use if they have to play music all the time as well, at least not once the battery is a year old. With my current one, having to balance usage to make sure it'll be available when I need it is getting annoying and includes "no music now".
At least in the past storage in phones was needlessly expensive and scarce, this has gotten better, and you can still get enough phones with microSD slots, despite the best attempts of some manufacturers to get rid of them.
Bluetooth also has gotten more reliable, that helps, but at least among the devices I've tried that's really a recent development, and still not perfect.
I totally get that other people will evaluate this differently (and/or buy better phones than me), but I don't see it as an obvious answer.