[KekDemaga]

The government is at least equally incompetent if not more so, at least if a private entity screws up you can sue.

[emodendroket]

The government is also not operated on a for-profit basis incentivizing doing the bare minimum level of security to shield yourself from liability.

[KekDemaga]

>The government is also not operated on a for-profit basis incentivizing doing the bare minimum level of security to shield yourself from liability.

No instead they hire contractors for that purpose.

[emodendroket]

OK, well, while I'm making proposals, let's go ahead and hire people to be employed by the government instead.

[KekDemaga]

The reason the government doesn't do that is talented people don't want to work for them. Virtually all the government jobs are union and pay is primarily based on time served. You'd be getting third rate talent at best.

[emodendroket]

I don't think that's the real reason, to be honest. More like some combination of anti-hiring ideology and a handful of people getting rich off the process. The British government did it with, apparently, real success. And are government contractors really much better places to work?

[mcv]

I guess we'll see how that turns out with Equifax.