|
|
|
|
|
by k__
3169 days ago
|
|
I always read that crypto currencies will replace money, because they are distributed. But does a blockchain, that is at the core of every(?) crypto currency really scale well? Keeping the whole ledger constantly available seems rather storage and traffic intensive to me. |
|
There are plans to fix this - sharding on Ethereum, Lightning Network on Bitcoin - but both are largely vaporware at this stage.
In practice, a lot of the transaction action happens inside the individual exchanges, not on the blockchain itself - so we already have a "level 1" and "level 2" system.
Also, there's issues of securing your bitcoins - "be your own bank" means "be your own extremely knowledgeable chief security officer". This is why even a lot of big holders keep a lot of money on exchanges (and lost lots in Mt. Gox). And why losses due to human error are extremely common.
The blockchain is more interesting than useful.