[bhauer]

Aside from a few exceptions, I don't wish death on any big companies. I would nevertheless like to see each of the named company's dominance reduced substantially if only to see what the alternatives look like once afforded some breathing room. As much as network effects are an inevitable part of the human condition, I rail against the behavior as the very small market actor I am. In my day-to-day market activities, I regularly seek out less-dominant vendors and service providers.

Of the named companies, I am most comfortable with Amazon. Most interactions I have with Amazon yield a tangible service predicated on me being the customer. While some alternatives provide better browsing and discovery, there are few online shopping sites that provide the convenience and immediacy of Amazon.

Apple would presumably also treat me as the customer, but I don't like the design of their devices or software and there are good alternatives. As a non-customer, Apple's existence doesn't offend me, but I do find them tedious and the amount of media attention they capture can be exhausting.

Facebook and Google don't have business models that permit them to consistently treat me as the customer, so I do what I can to avoid their services. What services they do provide (for "free") are of low value to me. I can interact with friends on a wide array of communication media. I can search the Internet via other engines. I can send and receive email from my personal mail server.

Assuming their futures mimic their present—which is probably a bad assumption—of these four, the disappearance of Facebook, Google, and Apple would be of little or no consequence to my life.