Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bistro 3173 days ago
Wouldn't working as a recruiter be tedious at any company?
5 comments

If the recruiter is given specific hiring criteria that are hard but not impossible to satisfy, I could imagine looking for people who fit those requirements and persuading them to sign up would be a satisfying job of search, selection and salesmanship.

But that's not what these Google recruiters are doing. They are trying to find any vaguely qualified people they can who are willing to dive head-first into the meat-grinder that is the Google interview process. And their job is mostly futile because that process will ultimately reject 90-95% of the candidates.

Sounds like these recruiters could be replaced by a simple google search...
It's kind of weird they need recruiters at all. There is no more famous tech company than Google. You'd think they would get enough applicants just through their main website.
Sure sounds like that person's job can and should be automated, leaving the remaining recruiters doing more interesting work.
Wouldn’t moving bits around or aligning pixels on a screen be tedious at any company?
Guess you'd expect a company with Google's level of innovation to make any process less tedious.
Well, the author says all he has to do is type 2 letters to send invites and rejection, maybe with a few words to make it look personal. The process is streamlined, that doesn't make it more interesting.
Sounds like the recruiter would rather type the entire correspondence.
As an ex-recruiter, here's what my dream job would have been like:

1. No arbitrary process numbers. Job and cost numbers fine, but "10 calls a day" "5 BD calls a day" "20 resume sends a week" is stupid - would rather have a manager helping me make strategic decisions, using my time intelligently.

2. Automated bullshit. No more downloading resumes to upload to our system. We either pay linkedin and use that exclusively, or outsource somebody to fill out our own CRM (actually good CRM that has functional searching, not that Bullhorn bullshit that barely worked).

That's all it would take. If a recruiter annoys you, it's probably because you're Candidate Call #9 of the day and she has to get to 10 or she'll lose her job.

Agreed.

I see this as a problem with HR and recruiting in general, not a Google problem.

The only reason this is news at all is because Google is in the title. Replace that with any other company name and it just describes another position that could either be automated or outsourced.

that's spot on about piggybacking off of Google fame, funny how far riding another's coattails can take things.