[inboulder]

0.9 to 1.6 as a multiplier is absolutely terrible, that's a crazy discounted cash flow rate, at those multiples you are guaranteed to be better off just holding onto the business unless you know it is going under very rapidly. 5x is starting to become reasonable.

[thiele]

0.9 to 1.6 multiplier seemed really low to me too. I'd love to hear some more opinions of "common" multipliers.

[bmr]

I've done grunt work on some deals and seen multipliers in the 6-14X range. But the multiple was of EBITDA, not revenue.

If you talk in terms of revenue, multipliers can vary as wildy as companies' margins do. EBITDA (or one of its zillion variations) common-sizes the multiple.

[JacobAldridge]

You're correct, the difference is multiplying by gross revenue or by EBITDA. In Accounting firms, for example, it is common to have a multiple (often about 0.9) of Revenue, which is often 3-5 times EBITDA. A property management rent roll is another example where revenue is used, often 2.7 - 3.2 times depending on the market.

Most companies, however, are sold on EBITDA multiples. Unless the new business can rapidly be plugged into existing processes (like in accounting and property management), then the buyer wants to have a better idea of profit margins. EDITDA will give them that.