|
|
|
|
|
|
by 2g67vupsoknn
3178 days ago
|
|
|
Do you agree that TechCrunch's headline (and, by extension, HN's) is misrepresenting what the apology was actually for? Regardless of if the criticism is justified, my point here is that there was no apology made for the planning/execution of the presentation itself -- just for the offense it caused to those who misunderstood the goals of the presenter. It's one thing to believe an apology wasn't necessary. It's another thing to believe it's OK for "journalists" to massage this corporate non-apology into something more palatable. |
|
|