[dang]

You're doubling down on what I asked you not to do, which is casually sling accusations of mental illness with an internet swear word. If you do it again we will ban you.

Even if you were right in this case (which you have no evidence for, just a connect-the-dots cartoon, and few dots at that), this would still be so. "Sociopath" comes even before "shill" on the feces-throwing internet trigger list. Every time we tolerate such a violation of the site guidelines encourages others to do the same. That slope is both slippery and steep. Since my #1 job is to (try to) prevent HN from plummeting to its death down it, it's not like this is a hard call.

[hungerstrike]

Without his comment we wouldn’t have had this whole conversation.

HN is sliding backwards due to this kind of censorship, not for lack of it.

[dang]

This is not a good conversation to be having; it's a necessary one, made necessary by people breaking this site's rules and endangering it.

You're talking to someone who has been doing this same thing for so many years that I basically do it in my sleep, with about as much interest. If that's a backward slide, then (as Voltaire said when someone told him coffee was a slow poison) it must be very slow.

[hungerstrike]

> This is not a good conversation to be having.

In your (sleepy and uninterested) opinion. I love it. We're all learning so much! There are more comments on this sub-thread than the rest of the thread.

> I basically do it in my sleep, with about as much interest...

That's exactly what it feels like.

Congrats.

[dang]

> sleepy and uninterested

That of course was a joke, meant to acknowledge how tedious and off-topic these digressions are. A factual version of the remark would be something like 'I've done this tens of thousands of times over several years now, so any negative effect of the sort you're claiming would long have been priced into the system'.