|
|
|
|
|
by lukasschwab
3171 days ago
|
|
How do you feel about grindcore? Certainly it has musical and aesthetic merit, historical importance, and it demands talented composers and performers. Additionally, there is lots of other music for folks who don't enjoy it. If popular accessibility is all that matters, we could pare down music to the major popular genres. I don't think marches would make the cut. Fast debate is like grindcore; there's room in civics for specialization, even specialization that isn't aesthetically obvious. It's hard for most to pick out the logic or musicality from the noise of debate or grindcore, respectively. I would hate to live in a world where grindcore is the only music out there. But I'm glad I have the option of putting on some John Zorn when I'm in the mood. Competitive cubing is pretty cool, but it's an algorithm/dexterity problem that requires none of the creativity that debate demands. |
|
The point of Bach, or band songs, is not precisely to be popular. At least I sure never got popular playing them. :-)