| >Here it is again 'CP isn't wrong'. Yes it is, I don't see how you can think it's not. You haven't defined any criteria for 'wrong'; the person you are replying to is taking issue with the fact that the harm principle (a commonly accepted ideal of what is 'wrong' in individualist society) does not apply to any given instance of viewing or possessing child pornography. You have to define your criteria for 'wrong' rather than simply assert it. By defining criteria, only then can you be refuted in any meaningful sense, rather than a rally of "it's wrong" and "no it isn't wrong". So if you say that it is wrong, please back up your meta-ethical position. >It's not a kink, it's not a fetish, it's not a sexuality Pedophilia is a fetish; it may be other things too, but it is a fetish for children, this is even in the 'plain' sense of the word fetish, which is to concentrate on a particular aspect above all else. The pedophile, rather than fetishising say "normal" features like breath, fetishises extreme youth. >being a paedophile is totally fine then you need to get help Nowhere did the poster say this. |