Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by geowwy 3174 days ago
What can this do that emojis can't?
6 comments

Emoji are cute. Maybe the Japanese word for cute (可愛い) might grasp the concept a little better, but they are _something_ which should be fairly universally recognizable.

They fit in a certain kind of personal communication, and maybe horrifyingly into some literature, but they don't fit in a lot of places.

I'm ok using emoji with my girlfriend or if I'm trying to be sarcastic or ridiculous, but that's a rather narrow set of my communication. In short it's difficult to show decorum and use emoji. There's nothing wrong with silliness unless you can't do anything else.

We are in a situation where written language use is different and more extensive than days past and it's weakness in English shows. It's difficult to express yourself properly in many situations and while emoji are one way, little cute pictures don't fit the communication gaps.

Nothing, because they aren't different things.

(the characters are more abstract than most emoji, but only most)

I can't think of a corresponding emoji for many of these, like sarcasm, certitude, snark (maybe the one with its tongue sticking out?), doubt, irony, etc.
It's not an emoji, but as a similar sentence-ending mark, you often see /s used to indicate sarcasm. Similarly, "Kappa" may not be very popular outside a certain subculture, but it's very recognizable as snark at Twitch and adjacent communities.
We are lacking emoji for many important emotions, but IMO we should fix that by adding emoji. I think emoji are much more aligned with natural modes of human expression than punctuation marks are.
Is it a problem to have more than one way to express things?
Be more precise. Emojis are ambiguous, especially cross-culturally.
Actually blend with the text instead of sticking out like a sore thumb.
:thinking: