[conanbatt]

They would be lower prices, but there would be less home-owners.

If the final goal were to reduce prices, you just need to pass a law that all housing is worth 1$ for an unprecedented successful policy.

It is always interesting to me how in Real Estate, people are intelectually sensitive to price increases: as if price increments were a sign of things going awry. More often than not its the opposite: job creation in a city raises rents which is a net good (i.e. SF and Seattle). Or people moving out of their parents home earlier.

It is senseless to look at the price of one thing and focus on that as a measure of well-being. After all, a man in the 20's would look at our salaries and say we are all filthy rich.