|
|
|
|
|
|
by nl
3177 days ago
|
|
|
That's a weird response - the links basically support your position that Russian intervention was minimal. But your response makes it seem like you didn't read it at all! For example, they provide links to some of the Russian twitter accounts: For example, @DYGq72pblsGauqv (screen name Магаданец Р.Ф.) retweeted a post from Assange comparing events in Catalonia with those on Tiananmen Square in Beijing. This account posts almost exclusively in Russian, and focuses on propaganda accounts, including from the self-proclaimed territory of “Novorossiya” in Ukraine. The great majority of its posts are retweets, marking it as a probable bot. They also point out these are minority of the amplification: It should be pointed out that these were a minority, compared with the many apparently Catalan and American accounts, both bot and human, which retweeted Assange. Far from pathetic, I thought they were fairly balanced assessments of the claims. |
|
|
They support my position that there was no such intervention at all: i.e. that your claims are false. It is not that "there have been some attempts but not well organised", as you said. It's that there's no actual evidence of any attempts by the Russian government to do anything in Catalonia at all.
Why would pointing that out be a weird response?
As for "omg tweets", who cares? They present no evidence that such an account is a bot, or Russian, even though the random username makes it a possibility (possibilities not being the same thing as evidence).
But more importantly, how many people speak Russian in Catalonia to begin with, do you think? Surely a plot to somehow influence Catalonia events would involve doing things in Catalan or Spanish, not Russian?
The entire hypothesis falls apart the moment anyone inspects it. That's why it's pathetic.