|
|
|
|
|
by craftyguy
3185 days ago
|
|
So your argument is that because e-cig users are coming from one harmful product, that we should do nothing to prevent the new product from causing undue harm, and that eventually (decades?) e-cigs will become safer because someone (who?) will eventually phase out the harmful ones? Why not stop wasting time and lives, and prevent the harmful ones from being produced/released? |
|
The algebra for e-cig regulation is # of people saved by regulation - # of people killed by regulation(people who smoke more cigarettes because of the increased cost, and decreased variety of e-cigs)
And because cigarettes are sooooo dangerous even a small increase in smoking can causes the second term to overwhelm the first.