|
|
|
|
|
by admiralpumpkin
3179 days ago
|
|
I agree, there are always more way to make mistakes, 2nd law and all, but the process of assessing good study design, good protocol, good statistical methods, etc. are all the same as for manuscripts with non-null results. Many of these issues will, in theory, have been sorted at the funding level. What holds us back, it seems to me, isn't process, it's culture and inertia. |
|