[throway_foo_bar]

I applied once about a month ago, through SO, as linked in this post. I did not get a response, not even a cursory one. As you can see in that thread [0], someone tells care evolution that their link is dead. They do not get a response. Basically, this organization is pretty bad at engaging. It leaves a bad taste in the mouth as an applicant. It takes time on both sides; hiring and applying. Not taking the time to respond to applicants or potential applicants looks bad, and discourages interest.

[0]:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15150831

[johnumbaugh]

Original poster here.

As someone else suggested in this thread, we do get a pretty incredible volume of applicants. If it's clear from the resume that it's not a match, we generally don't contact the applicant. In an ideal world we would prefer to get back to each person who submits a resume - but the volume is such that we have decided not to do that.

However, we do carefully read every application. And once we engage with an applicant, we always respond and we respond promptly.

[throway_foo_bar]

Hey John, thank you for responding. I hope you take this as feedback, for I truly have no grudge or bitterness about it. If you looked at my resume and decided you're looking for something else, that's totally fine. I want to empathize with your role as an employer, and I ask that you do the same for me. As a candidate, I am applying to a dozen different places, amidst a busy life. Some communication helps keep everything together. It doesn't even have to be human but 1. Acknowledge receipt of my application. 2. Confirm that you've moved on to other applicants.

At some point, as your company grows, your recruiters may trawl the backlog of past applicants and decide to give me another look. It then becomes a question of how I remember my interactions with you. If you didn't have the time or systems to give me even the most cursory of feedback, you best believe I won't have the time to give you that either. So sure, there are hundreds of names, flying at you. But those names are people. A templated rejection letter is really the least you can do. Most applicant tracking systems support this.

[iamkhush]

Totally agree with you here. All of this is automated these days.

[jshc]

if you have to use a throway foo bar, whey do they need to get back to you? It's as a curtsey but don't think it's necessary. It's possible job hunters just spam resume for no reason. To me, a template reply is no better than a no rely.

[throway_foo_bar]

> if you have to use a throway foo bar

Ad-hominem.

> It's as a curtsey but don't think it's necessary.

The job hunt process is lubricated with politeness. Both employer and employee should want to make a good impression on each other; like on a first date. I can't imagine a situation where courtesy was more necessary than that. More so, when it costs next to nothing to send out an AUTOMATED email

1) Acknowledging receipt of an application and thanking the candidate. [Enables the candidate to keep records in a busy life]

2) Informing them you've moved on, and how soon they are allowed to apply again [Typically >3months].

[cpfohl]

For what it's worth, when you post a good job on HN you get well upwards of 200 applicants... I'm not with Care Evolution, but I sympathize with them.

[throway_foo_bar]

I empathize with them as well. But I hope my comment showed that there is a pattern of undesirable behavior here. Moreover, you shouldn't be reposting a job posting while still, presumably, working the backlog of candidates from a month ago.

[milofeynman]

Anything with REMOTE gets 50+ applications a week over at angel.co. There are also a lot of junk resumes to sort through in every job. You have to sell yourself well or have a network of connections who can put in a good word for you.