|
|
|
|
|
by eklavya
3187 days ago
|
|
Elm is nowhere near Haskell or Scala in expressibility. You would have to compare Purescript/GHCJS/ScalaJS. In the native Haskell/Scala land I usually don't have to do much ceremony and the functional code is succinct and a pleasure to write. They may lack the all powerful macros of LISPs but the need to reach for a macro seldom arises. The original point wasn't about code size it was about bugs and I was surprised to see Clojure doing better than the very strongly typed ones. Hence the comment on the smartness of Clojure people ;) |
|
The original point about bugs is in my opinion, regarding my comment you replied to, very similar to a discussion about code size. There are some great reads [0] that go into further depth on this issue, if you are curious.
[0] https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love/blob/master...