Also, why didn't he resolve the situation by either starting a new company or buying back his shares as soon as it was apparent Facebook could become something big?
Can someone please clarify the ethical as well as legal ramifications of subverting investors by starting a new company?
For example: You start company A, in market M. Your investors give you 5k in exchange for 50%. You spend your 5k learning about market M and now you're diluted. What's stopping you from creating company B, to attack same market, but from an enhanced perspective?