[thisisit]

Anomaly? How do you figure? With 100s of upcoming ICO, action against two is considered to be an anomaly?

Still I am not following your logic here. If this is fast, when do you figure SEC should have taken action? They should have let ICOs defraud people for years because they allowed it during the 2008 crisis before taking action? Two wrongs doesn't make one right.

Do look at my other post. These coins opened themselves to this action.

Additionally, I am sure if one was to dig enough you will find SEC had taken against some of the outright frauds, like these coins, even during the CDO phase.