Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gragas 3189 days ago
The subtitle is misleading.

>How a tiny country with high government spending bred a large number of vibrant young businesses

The article then goes on to attribute almost all of Sweden's success to deregulation and anti-monopoly laws---i.e., less government intervention ∝ more startup success.

6 comments

As usual it seems to be an issue not of the size of the regulation but the quality. Although in many areas Sweden has a lot less regulation than the U.S. - you don't need a license to be a hairdresser, taxis are mostly deregulated, etc. It seems all the time I hear about things that are micromanaged legally in the US that are just dealt with by common sense in Sweden.
High government spending and deregulation are not the same thing.
anti-monopoly laws seem to be the exact opposite of "less government regulation".
maybe pro-competitive market would be a better intended description
That's still a form of government regulation.
competition is what all the benefits of markets comes from, not non-intervention.
The subhead is hilarious considering the size of government in the Bay Area, New York, Boston and Tel Aviv, etc.
And it shouldn't all be characterized as success. I wonder who in this thread has actually worked in Sweden before... I've had clients there and worked from co-working spaces, and I saw more fucking around and play time and work not getting done than I've ever seen admitted.
It sounds so dismal. I'll stick to my cubicle and continue staring at my screen for 12 hours a day. Thanks but no thanks amirigt?
Sarcasm noted. It is quite a dismal place. Sure, it has great nature and the infrastructure is quite nice. However, the culture is such that most young people you'll meet are trying to escape - still while pumping out lots of overly positive marketing material via news media.
Could you please elaborate?
Anti-monopoly laws = less government intervention?