|
|
|
|
|
|
by int_19h
3190 days ago
|
|
|
Thing is, if syscalls in BSD are considered stable the way they are in Linux, then you could just ship your own kernel with BSD's libc. But if they consider it an internal API between kernel and libc, and apps are only ever supposed to depend on libc, then of course that doesn't work. So stability of syscall API is the de facto differentiating factor here. It sounds like Microsoft couldn't do "Windows Subsystem for BSD" the way it did WSL, for example. |
|
|