|
|
|
|
|
by soVeryTired
3191 days ago
|
|
I don't really know what you mean by evaluation. But you need to be able to (faithfully) generate all the positions your system would take through time, and also to generate all the returns you would have made through time. Aside from pure P&L, you should be looking at how much risk your system is taking, and under what conditions it's doing badly. All backtests are overfit: their use is mostly in identifying problems with your strategy, rather than predicting how much money you'll make. One question you'd get asked if you were proposing this in a real trading environment is this: what is it about the QM emini contract that makes this work? Does it work for other energy contracts? For other commodities? For bonds, or equities? If not, why not? |
|
It took some doing to get this model to perform well. I did this by adding features that help recognize patterns in the time series data.
The features I created are not specific to QM as they are technical (eg. numbers, not news), and time-series related. So the models should work with any historical dataset with the same fields.
My goal is to add another future at some point.