[moduspol]

It certainly isn't if you're planning to make it your career, but Uber markets driving for them as flexible and easy with little/no up-front costs.

Clearly this would affect ride-sharing companies more than taxi companies, and it's likely no coincidence.

[s73ver_]

Given that, right now, taxi companies do have to do this, and Uber doesn't, I would say no, this is going to affect Uber the same. As it should.

[moduspol]

Yep. And a policy that limited maximum driver hours to 20 per week would "apply equally to taxis and Uber," but would clearly hit taxis a lot harder than Uber.

This is protectionism under the guise of "fairness." Nothing more.

[s73ver_]

I completely disagree. There is nothing unfair about this move. It affects both parties equally.