[CocaKoala]

The fact that the ruling goes out of its way to explain the meaning of the phrase "defendant [...] has a regular and established place of business" by explaining that "regular" and "established" are adjectives which modify the noun "place", and that defendant is a word which here means "defendant" is very sarcastic language. The reasoning isn't elaborate, it's just saying "if you don't know how to interpret this phrase, let me say it again slower for you".