|
|
|
|
|
by stale2002
3191 days ago
|
|
This has nothing to do with "students refusing to see" certain people. It would be absolutely lovely, if it were solely that. What this has to do with is with students preventing other students from engaging with certain speakers. This is about insane protestors assaulting people, blocking entrances to venues, disrupting the actual events, and people trying to convince public universities to literally break the law by engaging in viewpoint discrimination. The examples that the NYT used were situations where people were attacked, and literally sent to the hospital. IE, the 50 year old democrat teacher from middlebury who had to go to the hospital, because some protesters assaulted her for protecting a speaker as they were trying to escape a mob of people who surrounded them, and wouldn't let them leave. Please, please, please lets all go back in time to when if you didn't like a speaker then you just didn't attend the speech. |
|