|
|
|
|
|
by MikeTheGreat
3192 days ago
|
|
"Selecting the best applicants possible" I predict stunning success, based on this sentence alone. That said - I think that providing help for people who are already doing well is nice, but it doesn't really support the real goal of public education: educating (all of) the public. Unless you're thinking that this will be a great for-profit biz, with the most successfully students+parents most able to pay top dollar for this? In which case - yeah, you've got a solid idea. It's essentially the same as idea as going to Harvard/Yale/Cornell/etc. If you can get a good round of 'seed families' (students+already successful parents) it just might work. |
|
Right, it is intended to be a for-profit business, not really interested in tackling better education for everyone.
Long term I think a great case will be made for taking some % of students that couldn't afford it, just based on their accomplishments/skills to date.
Rich parents send their under-14 yr olds to a summer camp (just for fun & MAYBE some sports lessons) and pay 10k+. For a program proven to boost their kids' chance of success, I think they'd be willing to pay even more than that.