[amluto]

I'm a bit puzzled. The code is at "syscalls-table-64bit", yet the regs are eax, etc. This makes very little sense.

In any event, I think the args should just be labeled arg0..arg5.

[LukeShu]

In several cases, the order of the args for a syscall varies between architectures--writing a general "arg0" doesn't make a lot of sense.

That said, I don't know what's up with it using 32-bit register names.