[ardit33]

Jesus, chill. I am reading it, (and I know nothing about CNN's), and learning about what do I need to read first about them. The author makes it clear on few things that you need to read before hand.

I think it is a good article/blog post, (thanks dude, whoever you are that wrote it).

You on the other hand didn't give any better alternatives on your "rant".

[biocomputation]

The comments are for discussing HN submissions. As written, the article is yet another data dump on CNNs. There are a lot of these on the web already, and I don't think this explanation is better than what already exists.

I stand by my comments.

> You on the other hand didn't give any better alternatives on your "rant".

I don't have to provide better alternatives. Note that my response did provide suggestions on how to improve the article.