[Upvoter33]

Come on - what part of the hiring process asks anything other than technical questions? For conservatives can't figure out why tech companies are filled with liberal leaning folks, here's a clue - there is a well-known correlation between education and liberalism.

[Clubber]

Are you arguing with me or Bannon?

>here's a clue - there is a well-known correlation between education and liberalism.

Pretty smug. Here's some research that backs your assertion though:

http://www.people-press.org/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-g...

You'll notice that this reference only applies your conclusion to the "consistently liberal" category. I'm of the opinion that if anyone is either consistently liberal or consistently conservative, they're not really considering issues in and of themselves, but rather attaching themselves emotionally to political movements.

In other words, if you are a liberal and you can't think of a single conservative position you agree with, or if you are a conservative and you can't think of a single liberal position you agree with, you are on the Koolaid.

[InitialLastName]

The garbage thing is that there's not really anything coherent about the "liberal" and "conservative" positions in the US. There's no inherent ideological reason why one position should be in favor of strong government controls on abortion, drugs, immigration and marriage but against government controls on guns and corporate governance. And vice-versa. It's mostly historical happenstance, driven by electoral motives and demographic shifting.

[Clubber]

Oh you are absolutely right. If you take it way back to first principles, you have two parties that need to get at least 50% + 1 of the population to vote for them (or at least people who vote). How do they accomplish that? They plant their flag on the side of a position, then their competitor plants their flag on the other side to counter it. If their competitor plants their flag, they have to plant their flag on the other side of their position. If a third party comes along, they could plant their flag on the sensible sides of these issues (and make the existing parties look out of touch), so the two parties actively prevent third parties from gaining traction. It's a political oligarchy, and to make things shittier, these are private (non-government) organizations that control our political system.

Wedge issues in the US are a good example of this. They will never get solved, politicians have no intentions to solve them either. They exist as a place to plant a flag every cycle. They also serve as a centerpiece of a campaign so politicians don't have to try to solve the hard, unsolvable problems, like how to improve the economics of the non-coastal areas, criminal justice reform, rolling back the drug war without admitting a Vietnam defeat, how to roll back the Middle East policies without admitting a Vietnam defeat, etc.

[Upvoter33]

arguing with " I would say those fears are not unfounded." - so you :)

We can agree on your last sentence though: "In other words, if you are a liberal and you can't think of a single conservative position you agree with, or if you are a conservative and you can't think of a single liberal position you agree with, you are on the Koolaid." If people can't look beyond party for ANY position, we are in trouble.

[Clubber]

>If people can't look beyond party for ANY position, we are in trouble.

Yes, and based on those charts, it looks like we're in trouble. :)