|
|
|
|
|
by marenkay
3192 days ago
|
|
If most people are not willing to pay a sustainable price for delivering food, they have to cook or walk to the restaurant. It is not the task of social services to pay for that. I also have strong objections to the notion of unskilled work here. Any kind of work requires training and skills, and I think you should never take the high road of having better education. It's in general 40 hours of your life time for any job you do. Coming back to that... is it realistic that all people having higher income now pay for food deliveries so that some companies can make money? I doubt it. That questionable both from economic and ethical viewpoints. Regarding the advance of our economy I can not agree. We are basically recessing to 19th century trades and valuation of work. Just because things are IT based mostly now that does not make up a more advanced economy. Looking at laws, work practices, standards, I dare to say: we are actually watching the whole of mankind failing to take the next step. We've made it to value of an individuals work, now we're killing that where instead we could also be asking us if our actual views on working and monetary compensation make sense. From my point of view (and I've been on the crazy low and high paid side), it does not. As does compensating low paid jobs from all tax payers money instead of simply putting companies out of business if they can not sustain themselves. |
|