Aztec is more compact than QR - does not need margin and because it's optimised for lowercase letters (used a lot for urls). Also has tunable error correction.
Doesn't the QR standard allow lowercase via hex and have a miniature version? I know it has error correction, but I'm not sure if it is tunable. I know it can embed kanji, so it seems odd that lowercase would be much of a problem?
Thanks!
I am pretty grateful I'm not tasked with implementing these.
It's not that lowercase is a problem, it's that aztec is more efficient at it.
Note that GP is incorrect that you need lowercase to express URLs and qrcode has an "alphanumeric" mode (based around uppercases which works fine), but even then qrcode's alphanumeric mode is slightly less efficient as it needs 5.5 bits per character versus 5 for Aztec.
Kanji has its own qrcode encoding mode (the qrcode encoding modes are numeric, alphanumeric[0], byte, kanji, structured append[1], ECI[2] and Code128[3]).
However, https://news.ycombinator.com/REPLY?id=15319423 does not work. Domain names are fine, because DNS is case insensitive in the ascii region by specification; I don't know about punycode for Unicode domain names. Paths beyond the domain name are expected to be case sensitive, but may be insensitive depending on the server environment (windows servers usually would be insensitive when serving files, Yahoo servers have a plugin to lowercase everything in the path to help with people typing in urls from offline media where users or publishers may not be very careful.
Thanks!
I am pretty grateful I'm not tasked with implementing these.