|
|
|
|
|
by taeric
3195 days ago
|
|
Like the sibling said, you could bake the stats into member fields to cache the values. I'm guessing it wouldn't caused any real slow down, but I can understand the concern. Would also help for repeated calls to the same stat. Though, I would also think a general .stats method would make the most sense. It is quite often nowdays to want a lot of stats. And again, I am not arguing that the new lib shouldn't exist. I just question that example. |
|