They need their bread and circuses, otherwise, they will come pillage your property.
> they will come pillage your property
Going by your reasoning, there are many more people without property than ones with, why bother protecting property rights at all?
That's "most people" fallacy you are showing all over the thread.
Also, if there were a large group with nothing to lose, you would not need any protection of your property?
By that reasoning, society would have protections in place to prevent against theft and robbery.
You're actually making so little sense with your smart cynicist mask so that I'm giving up on you.
> they will come pillage your property
Going by your reasoning, there are many more people without property than ones with, why bother protecting property rights at all?
That's "most people" fallacy you are showing all over the thread.