Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Nition 3200 days ago
Have they given a reason as to why it's not larger than 32-bit?
2 comments

The address space is 128 bit. You don't need a planet, but for a theoretical $10 price tag, why wouldn't you get one?

(FWIW I have never seen anyone pay $10 for their planet.)

Yes, and it's been quoted and referred to multiple times in this discussion thread.
What I meant was, is there a reason to keep it low beyond "bigger isn't necessary"? Like a performance reason for instance, or an address is like a URL so shorter is easier to remember, or something like that.

The reason I ask is if there's a good reason that a bigger address space would be worse in some way, then "bigger isn't necessary" might be a decent argument, but if there's no good reason not to make it bigger, then it's not such a good argument.

While planet names would get harder to remember if they were longer (48 bits and six syllables instead of 32 bits and four syllables), the main reason they want the address space to be somewhat scarce is to make spam economically infeasible.