|
|
|
|
|
by thephyber
3195 days ago
|
|
I continue to hear this argument, but it isn't 1980. The top tax rate is a little of half what it was then and the lowest marginal income tax rate is still 0% for those who make much below the national average. Those who are currently unemployed would not be directly affected by federal income tax rate changes (except perhaps if the "base is widened" as many fiscal conservatives want). You can look at Kansas for the problems that are caused by policymakers blindly lowering taxes without respect for the likely consequences. * Converting social program cliffs into gradients would incentivize people to seek alternatives to unemployment insurance. * Amnesty for those currently on SSDI if they go back to work (going on disability requires filing a federal form stating that you are physically/mentally unable to work, so later going back to work is effectively fraud). * Convert programs like {Section 8 housing, Food stamps, etc} to a UBI-like cash program without a cliff when you get a job. Don't penalize people for making a minimal amount of income. |
|