| > I've always thought that the answer was to have wealth taxes Oh, I totally think this is where we should be going, too! Income seems like such a weird thing to tax; the wealthiest people don't necessarily have income, and high earners aren't necessarily that wealthy. In terms of "tax the rich", I think wealth taxes are more along the lines of what people envision. It would simplify things so much, too; you don't have to worry about capital gains vs. ordinary income, or gifts, or the so-called "death tax". Businesses don't need to withhold taxes. It seems like a simple, low, flat wealth tax, over a certain cut-off, would be best. If would counteract the march to aristocracy and dynastic families, unless the children are similarly able to provide value with their assets. Otherwise their wealth will dwindle over time and others will have a shot. I think the two negatives I can think of are: 1) dealing with liquidity - you might be "worth" millions, but does that mean you can afford your tax bill? and 2) off-shore havens storing the wealth. But neither seem insurmountable. I'd love to see any discussions of pros-and-cons of this approach to taxation. I know Islam proscribes a wealth tax, Zakat, but I'm not sure how it works in practice. |