|
|
|
|
|
|
by oconnor663
3200 days ago
|
|
|
I think the idea of the question is, if you're talking about the difference between losing 50% of your value (doing nothing), and losing 49% of your value (making a small illegal trade), would it make sense to expose yourself to criminal liability for that 1%, even if that 1% represents a lot of money in absolute terms? |
|
|